Mike Heritage FFF MCI UK

Fly casting and talking fly casting bollox

Publish And Be Damned

I have alluded to it in a previous post but isn’t the World Wide Web a wonderful thing…. or is it?

 Everything is so accelerated. I very much doubt that we actually discover anything new about flycasting that hasn’t been discovered, and re discovered, several times over the last hundred years or so, although technology has allowed us to see things that would not have been possible a few years ago. The difference is that instead of writing a letter and receiving a reply a month later and then replying to maybe one or two other correspondents  we can now discuss it and (possibly) come to a conclusion in hours. This is done under public gaze, any one of whom can jump in whenever they like and add their contribution. Whereas, those thinkers pre internet days had to sit and cogitate and ponder to work out their particular theories. Plus, they had to put it down on paper in a way that they hoped the person they were writing to would understand.

 Of course they must have reached conclusions, the difference is it may have taken years and none of us ever got to hear them unless they published a book (come on, be honest, how many of you go and buy a book on fly casting? I don’t) and the book would have to cover all aspects of flycasting not just one little aspect! imagine the amount of letters tooing and froing while the author checks out thisnthat. Now all you have to do is pose a question on a forum and hey presto there’s your answer….or is it?

 I don’t know if it happens in other languages, I hope so,  but written English is a pain in the arse. One word may have two or three different meanings, put another word in front or behind and the meaning can change again. A whole sentence can be open to any number of interpretations, if you are not carefull. I have been pulled up any number of times for my apparent mis-use of one word. In fact some people delight in deliberately mis understanding (is that actually possible?) something I have written. I know this doesn’t just happen to me, I’m not paranoid. So, those people who wrote ‘how to’ books in the past were either very brave, or egocentric, with skins as thick as a rhino. They put into print their own ideas and theories, published, and were damned. They didn’t realise that in a few years they were liable to have bits put up on the web, possibly out of context, to be, sometimes ripped shreds, sometimes defended and, occasionally, rediscovered. 

 Yep, the web is a wonderful thing. Just think, in a couple of hundred years time someone may drag this blog out of the ether and wonder, what the hell has this got to do with fly casting? What is flycasting? Come to that what is a fish?

 Normal service will be resumed soon.


January 6, 2010 - Posted by | Uncategorized


  1. “come on, be honest, how many of you go and buy a book on fly casting?”

    I buy as much books on fly casting as I can; the last one less than a month ago :^)
    In some aspects they are much better than what you can find on the Web. Anyway, IMHO a fly casting instructor should be well read on what other instructors have written.
    I hope I haven’t misunderstood you! :^)


    Comment by Aitor | January 6, 2010 | Reply

  2. Hi Mike, couldn’t agree more, books can and do their best to educate the reader but I have yet come across one that can explain what I am doing wrong?? so at best they give me something to do these cold snowed in evenings

    Regards – Alan

    Comment by Alan Sandom | January 6, 2010 | Reply

  3. Alan,

    Try with “Troubleshooting the cast” by Ed Jaworowski. :^)


    Comment by Aitor | January 6, 2010 | Reply

  4. “In fact some people delight in deliberately mis understanding (is that actually possible?)”

    oh, yes. definitely. in fact i have a friend that makes it a specialty 😉

    great post Mike. you should write a book ! i’d buy it.


    Comment by marc fauvet | January 9, 2010 | Reply

  5. I was discussing how to write a book the other day and decided I don’t have the disipline, it would start out as flycasting and end up somewhere else entirely.

    I much prefer dvd’s, I’m a look and learn person, reading just confuses me.

    Comment by Mike Heritage | January 10, 2010 | Reply

  6. Alright Mike. I’ve got a load of books too. Some of them have helped me no end. Call me old fashioned, but I like paper!

    Comment by Steve | January 13, 2010 | Reply

  7. Books are the carriers of civilization. Without books, history is silent, literature dumb, science crippled, thought and speculation at a standstill.

    Henry David Thoreau

    Comment by Aitor | February 6, 2010 | Reply

  8. I bet he said that before computers Aitor. I can’t dissagree with you, I love books, I have hundreds of them, the majority are fiction though. I have very few rules in life but one of them is only read an instruction manunual when all else has failed. I work from visual stimulation, I see, I learn. I read, I get confused.

    Comment by Mike Heritage | February 6, 2010 | Reply

  9. Well, 99% of this blog is reading. I hope nobody is getting confused with it. ;^)

    Comment by Aitor | February 6, 2010 | Reply

  10. ha ha ! good one Amigo 😉

    Comment by marc fauvet | February 6, 2010 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: